Spinning Cylinder Experiments
8/15/05
Spining copper cylinders 2" 3" 4" of increasing thickness.
1- Thicker copper causes increased drag to motor
2- All magnet polarities seem to cause drag
3- All steel drive attachments end up magnetized with intresting polarities.
4- 1700 RPM does not increase RPM whatsoever but induces drag in every case.
5- There is no reflected magnet reversal at 1700 RPM, all magnets seem to extend through the
copper with thier flux patterns fully in tack. The compass indicates as if the copper was not there
6- When holding a magnet by spining steel attachments, the compass folows the magnet,
when pulling the magnet away the attachments reverse the compass to reflect its magnetized state
opposite the magnet that magnetized it.
7- The magnetic field from the magnets is aparent reaching all the way inside the motor, reducing RPM
drastically if held very close to the spining copper
Dave L [expierments preformed on 08/27/05]
{The transfer of torsion between various elements - copper, steel, and magnets}
Spining metals cylinder expierments:
Copper
When a copper cylinder is held stationary inside another spining copper or steel
[iron] cylinder no noteable forces seem to be transferred between the cylinders.
When a magnet is brought near a spining copper cylinder two forces are produced
in the magnet easily felt in your hand.
1- A repulsive force 90 deg to motion [magnetic reflection] induced by induction
[felt as a cushoning force]
2- A dragging force parallel to motion [torsion] induced from
the torsional power present in the spining cylinder
*No movement or shifting of magnet polarity or direction of poles has any effects on the
two forces produced. Only area and distance between copper and magnet seem to have
an effect.
*The presence of a compass shows no alternate magnetic fields produced and no
alteration or bending of the magnets lines of flux. The flux seems to move through
the copper, wether spining or not, unrestricted and unbent. During spining there
is no trailing magnetic field in the copper dectecable strong enough to account for
the parallel force, or strong enough to move the needle of the compass in the slightest.
*The presence of another stationary copper layer between the magnet and the spining
copper cylinder is invisible to the process and neither blocks the effect or produces
any dragging to the stationary copper. There is no linking of torsion between the
copper layers, only from the moving copper to the magnet.
Steel [iron]
When a magnet is brought near a spining steel cylinder only one force seems present
1- An attraction towards the center of the steel mass [independent of RPM]
2- No dragging force seems to be present as with the copper [torsion is absent]
*The steel is also quickly magnitized by this effect with a south outwards
or aiding magnetic field. This is easily observed with a compass during the
interaction. Lines of magnetic flux are bent and distorted by the steel but
no torsion transfer is present.
Two cylinder expierments:
Copper and Steel
When magnets are placed on a spining copper cylinder and brought inside a steel
cylinder [on a free turning axis from the opposite direction], the iron cylinder
does not spin up in the slightest.
1- An attraction force is present [magnetic] as shown with magnets earlier
2- No [torsion] is transferred between the cylinders
When magnets are placed on a spining steel cylinder brought inside a free turning
copper cylinder, the copper cylinder quickly spins up.
1- [Torsion] is transferred from magnets to copper or copper to magnets
2- Also the iron does not seem to lower the reach of the magnets as was expected
they "sink in" easily at 1/4 to 1/2 inch and transfer the torsion to the copper cylinder.
Deductions:
Copper seems to have a quality missing in iron, the ability to
transfer force [torsion] through an established magnetic field into the magnet.
This torsion is not dependent on magnet pole positioning and works equally
for all magnet positions.
Copper seems to transfer its "momentum" through the magnetic field,
linking it or sinking it into the magnet. Iron does not. Copper has a special quality.
[Momentum or torsion transfer].
This may be why copper is listed as a favorable AG material.
Also why iron is not present on the list.
Spining magnet expierments:
To see whether the torsional force transferred from spining copper is dependent on which
material is in movement [spining]. It is now necessary to spin the magnets on an ABS
plastic material then place the copper cylinder inside it.
This expierment shows that the copper is now pulled along with the magnets.
The [torsion] or [momentum] is transferred from the spining magnets to the copper.
Centering force:
Also it is noted that the [centering force] is very present and does stablize the
copper cylinder inside the spining magnets quite well at 1700 RPM providing a cushioning
effect.
Conclusion:
Wether the parallel force between copper and magnets in motion is due to shifting the
magnetic field backwards in time [Tesla] in the material in motion [offsetting the repulsive
magnetic force], or due to a transfer of [torsion] across the magnetic field is still an
unknown. I feel it is unlikely that a trailing magnetic field in the copper is responsible
as a compass does not shift in the least due to any copper interactions.
Because I have not been able to percieve a shift in the magnetic field,
the most likely true statement is this:
Theory:
Spining copper transfers its [torsion] or [momentum] into a magnet when its magnetic field
sinks into it, irregaurdless of magnetic polarity. Spining iron or steel do not.
Spining magnets transfer their [momentum] or [torsion] into copper held in close proximity
as well. Direction of torsion transfer moves from higher to lower energy, either
direction, but maintains its direction parallel to the force that induces it.
Summary Comment:
Current teachings:
The results observed do not seem to follow my current simple understanding of
electric and magnetic fields with respect to copper, electron flow, motion, and polarity
of magnetic fields. It is intresting to find a force being transferred that is not
subject to magnet polarity or angle, atributed to electron interaction of [induction]
which is stated to operate at only 90 degrees to such magnetic and electric fields.
The resultant force does not seem to weaken or bend the flux of the magnet as
indicated by a compass using copper.
If the parallel movement was due to electromagnetic fields, how could a magnet
push against itself as claimed with reverse induction? How could a reflected magnet
from the copper push at 90 degrees to opposing magnet polarity?
Why would it push towards the coppers motion?
Torsion transfer:
It is more likely that another force is present with [copper] yet to be explained,
that current electrical theory has not covered very well [torsion transfer].
If this [torsion transfer] can be reversed to aid spin, then the reported
acceleration of ZPE devices could be understood and a new motive force
available for power generation.
This is an exciting observation because [torsion] has been identified to be one dimension
of the [gravity torsion] field. It is the field emitting from the Aether which shows elastic
qualities and therefore to be the one field that can be altered, streched or compressed,
that may also affect the gravity field at right angles to it.
As to electric motors:
Also noteworthy is the realization that in an electric motor, any copper in motion
inside a magnetic field, if left de-energized, will become a heavy drag to motion.
This would seem to indicate that motors could be improved by adding cycles
of opposing magnetic force when moving away from the field that attracted them,
and never left in a state of being not energized. Motors could be developed that
reverse the current direction as the rotor winding passes the field winding,
rather then simply de-energizing them. This should reduce copper losses as
well as heat losses and improve motor effeciency.
Notes on metals:
Copper:
-Does not bend a magnetic field or effect the lines of flux in any percievable way
-Transfers its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field sunk into it
-If locked motionless, resists the motion of the matter that created the moving
magnetic field without regaurd to positioning of magnetic poles
-If shaped into wire and held motionless, transfers a moving magnetic field
into a varying electric field at 90 degrees to motion of the magnetic field
Iron or steel surface:
-Bends and distorts a magnetic field altering lines of flux
-Does not transfer its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field
-If locked motionless, does not resist the motion of the matter that created the
moving magnetic field but merely attracts all magnetic poles equally towards
it's center of mass.
Definitions:
AG = abbrev Antigravity
[Crandall lists copper, aluminium, bismuth and
element 115 as favorable antigravity materials]
Home
{The transfer of torsion between various elements - copper, steel, and magnets}
Spining metals cylinder expierments:
Copper
When a copper cylinder is held stationary inside another spining copper or steel
[iron] cylinder no noteable forces seem to be transferred between the cylinders.
When a magnet is brought near a spining copper cylinder two forces are produced
in the magnet easily felt in your hand.
1- A repulsive force 90 deg to motion [magnetic reflection] induced by induction
[felt as a cushoning force]
2- A dragging force parallel to motion [torsion] induced from
the torsional power present in the spining cylinder
*No movement or shifting of magnet polarity or direction of poles has any effects on the
two forces produced. Only area and distance between copper and magnet seem to have
an effect.
*The presence of a compass shows no alternate magnetic fields produced and no
alteration or bending of the magnets lines of flux. The flux seems to move through
the copper, wether spining or not, unrestricted and unbent. During spining there
is no trailing magnetic field in the copper dectecable strong enough to account for
the parallel force, or strong enough to move the needle of the compass in the slightest.
*The presence of another stationary copper layer between the magnet and the spining
copper cylinder is invisible to the process and neither blocks the effect or produces
any dragging to the stationary copper. There is no linking of torsion between the
copper layers, only from the moving copper to the magnet.
Steel [iron]
When a magnet is brought near a spining steel cylinder only one force seems present
1- An attraction towards the center of the steel mass [independent of RPM]
2- No dragging force seems to be present as with the copper [torsion is absent]
*The steel is also quickly magnitized by this effect with a south outwards
or aiding magnetic field. This is easily observed with a compass during the
interaction. Lines of magnetic flux are bent and distorted by the steel but
no torsion transfer is present.
Two cylinder expierments:
Copper and Steel
When magnets are placed on a spining copper cylinder and brought inside a steel
cylinder [on a free turning axis from the opposite direction], the iron cylinder
does not spin up in the slightest.
1- An attraction force is present [magnetic] as shown with magnets earlier
2- No [torsion] is transferred between the cylinders
When magnets are placed on a spining steel cylinder brought inside a free turning
copper cylinder, the copper cylinder quickly spins up.
1- [Torsion] is transferred from magnets to copper or copper to magnets
2- Also the iron does not seem to lower the reach of the magnets as was expected
they "sink in" easily at 1/4 to 1/2 inch and transfer the torsion to the copper cylinder.
Deductions:
Copper seems to have a quality missing in iron, the ability to
transfer force [torsion] through an established magnetic field into the magnet.
This torsion is not dependent on magnet pole positioning and works equally
for all magnet positions.
Copper seems to transfer its "momentum" through the magnetic field,
linking it or sinking it into the magnet. Iron does not. Copper has a special quality.
[Momentum or torsion transfer].
This may be why copper is listed as a favorable AG material.
Also why iron is not present on the list.
Spining magnet expierments:
To see whether the torsional force transferred from spining copper is dependent on which
material is in movement [spining]. It is now necessary to spin the magnets on an ABS
plastic material then place the copper cylinder inside it.
This expierment shows that the copper is now pulled along with the magnets.
The [torsion] or [momentum] is transferred from the spining magnets to the copper.
Centering force:
Also it is noted that the [centering force] is very present and does stablize the
copper cylinder inside the spining magnets quite well at 1700 RPM providing a cushioning
effect.
Conclusion:
Wether the parallel force between copper and magnets in motion is due to shifting the
magnetic field backwards in time [Tesla] in the material in motion [offsetting the repulsive
magnetic force], or due to a transfer of [torsion] across the magnetic field is still an
unknown. I feel it is unlikely that a trailing magnetic field in the copper is responsible
as a compass does not shift in the least due to any copper interactions.
Because I have not been able to percieve a shift in the magnetic field,
the most likely true statement is this:
Theory:
Spining copper transfers its [torsion] or [momentum] into a magnet when its magnetic field
sinks into it, irregaurdless of magnetic polarity. Spining iron or steel do not.
Spining magnets transfer their [momentum] or [torsion] into copper held in close proximity
as well. Direction of torsion transfer moves from higher to lower energy, either
direction, but maintains its direction parallel to the force that induces it.
Summary Comment:
Current teachings:
The results observed do not seem to follow my current simple understanding of
electric and magnetic fields with respect to copper, electron flow, motion, and polarity
of magnetic fields. It is intresting to find a force being transferred that is not
subject to magnet polarity or angle, atributed to electron interaction of [induction]
which is stated to operate at only 90 degrees to such magnetic and electric fields.
The resultant force does not seem to weaken or bend the flux of the magnet as
indicated by a compass using copper.
If the parallel movement was due to electromagnetic fields, how could a magnet
push against itself as claimed with reverse induction? How could a reflected magnet
from the copper push at 90 degrees to opposing magnet polarity?
Why would it push towards the coppers motion?
Torsion transfer:
It is more likely that another force is present with [copper] yet to be explained,
that current electrical theory has not covered very well [torsion transfer].
If this [torsion transfer] can be reversed to aid spin, then the reported
acceleration of ZPE devices could be understood and a new motive force
available for power generation.
This is an exciting observation because [torsion] has been identified to be one dimension
of the [gravity torsion] field. It is the field emitting from the Aether which shows elastic
qualities and therefore to be the one field that can be altered, streched or compressed,
that may also affect the gravity field at right angles to it.
As to electric motors:
Also noteworthy is the realization that in an electric motor, any copper in motion
inside a magnetic field, if left de-energized, will become a heavy drag to motion.
This would seem to indicate that motors could be improved by adding cycles
of opposing magnetic force when moving away from the field that attracted them,
and never left in a state of being not energized. Motors could be developed that
reverse the current direction as the rotor winding passes the field winding,
rather then simply de-energizing them. This should reduce copper losses as
well as heat losses and improve motor effeciency.
Notes on metals:
Copper:
-Does not bend a magnetic field or effect the lines of flux in any percievable way
-Transfers its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field sunk into it
-If locked motionless, resists the motion of the matter that created the moving
magnetic field without regaurd to positioning of magnetic poles
-If shaped into wire and held motionless, transfers a moving magnetic field
into a varying electric field at 90 degrees to motion of the magnetic field
Iron or steel surface:
-Bends and distorts a magnetic field altering lines of flux
-Does not transfer its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field
-If locked motionless, does not resist the motion of the matter that created the
moving magnetic field but merely attracts all magnetic poles equally towards
it's center of mass.
Definitions:
AG = abbrev Antigravity
[Crandall lists copper, aluminium, bismuth and
element 115 as favorable antigravity materials]
Home